The Lesbian & Gay Foundation » Update: After the Euro elections what are MEPs doing for LGBT rights?

Update: After the Euro elections what are MEPs doing for LGBT rights?

11 Aug 2009

Conservative MEP Roger Helmer denies homophobia exists, Labour MEP Arlene McCarthy challenges Lithuania's anti gay bill, while another Tory MEP stands up to homophobic polish party.

By Joanne Dunning

Back in June LGF online covered the European elections extensively; we asked the parties what they were going to do for LGBT rights in Europe.

In July the elected MEPs took their seats in the European Parliament and got down to business. Here we take a look at what MEPs have been doing for gay rights in Europe.

This week it was reported that Roger Helmer the Conservative MEP for the East Midlands had written on his blog that homophobia didn't exist, that he was opposed to same sex marriage and questioned the success of families that do not fit his definition of "conventional".

As part of his blog, Helmer was quick to defend members of the homophobic Polish Law and Justice party (PiS), who the Conservatives have allied themselves in Europe with as part of the the Conservative and Reformist Group (ECR).

Recently a member of the Law and Justice Party, claimed that the party were 'opposed to homosexual marriages ...that is how our MEPs will always vote'.

Helmer made clear his support for PiS, he went on to write: "our Polish colleagues are right to vote against homosexual marriage, and why I would join them in doing so."

He went on to say that he didn't "buy" homophobia, adding ''homophobia' is not so much a word as a political agenda. In psychiatry, a phobia is defined as an irrational fear. I have yet to meet anyone who has an irrational fear of homosexuals, or of homosexuality. So to the extent that the word has any meaning at all, it describes something which simply does not exist. 'Homophobia' is merely a propaganda device designed to denigrate and stigmatise those holding conventional opinions, which have been held by most people through most of recorded history."

Helmer's comments could damage David Cameron's bid to engage with the LGBT community, he's recently apologised for Section 28, and the party are holding an LGBT event as part of their annual party conference in Manchester this October.

"HELMER IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE NEW CONSERVATIVE PARTY."

Matthew Sephton LGBTory Chairman has hit back at Helmer's claims saying that he is not Conservative Logorepresentative of the new Conservative Party, he said: "I am completely disgusted with Roger Helmer's words. He most certainly does not represent the views of the modern Conservatives in any way, shape or form.

"To suggest that homophobia is not a real and everyday experience of many LGBT people in Britain and the world today is sheer lunacy. I am sure that Michael Causer's family for one would certainly attest to that.

"On the point of gay marriage, David Cameron made it clear in his Conference speech in 2007 that commitment, whether between a man and a woman, a man and a man or a woman and a woman is just as valid and should be respected and promoted as such. That is why we as a Party officially supported the introduction of civil partnerships.

"Roger Helmer is wrong in what he said and should be offially reprimanded by the Party for these words and for the sentiments that lie behind them and which, aside from anything else, amount to a betrayal of the fundamental Conservative ideals of equal opportunity to all individuals, without exception."

HELMER BACKTRACKS

Helmer's claims have been well documented in the press and yesterday he backtracked on his original comments in the Chronicle & Echo . He said: "I was not claiming that there is no discrimination, and that homosexuals do not suffer violence and prejudice from people because sadly, we all know that is not the case."

He added: "I was saying was that the word homophobia has no meaning...it is just a propagandist word created by the militant gay rights lobby."

R Leese A McCarthy T LloydLABOUR MEP SPEAKS OUT AGAINST LITHUANIA'S HOMOPHOBIC BILL

Meanwhile North West MEP Arlene McCarthy, has challenged the European Parliament to condemn Lithuania's introduction of the homophobic 'Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information'.

McCarthy who is also a member of the European Parliament's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) Intergroup has said: "I and my colleagues on the LGBT Intergroup are shocked and appalled at the introduction of this homophobic law, which flies in the face of the values of the European Union - liberty, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

"We have raised the issue with the European Commissioner responsible and written to the President of the European Parliament calling on him to condemn this legislation. We will continue to keep up the pressure on the Lithuanian Parliament and its members."

Tony Lloyd, Manchester Central MP and leader of Britain's Parliamentary delegation to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), said: "This move by the Lithuanian Parliament is totally unacceptable and undermines commitments Lithuania made in signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights as well as at the time of its entry into the European Union. I raised the issue of freedom for the LGBT community in Lithuania at a recent OSCE meeting and I will continue to call on Lithuania to change this law in line with its international commitments."

CONSERVATIVE MEP CHALLENGES HOMOPHOBIC POLISH PARTY

Last month Conservative MEP Edward McMillan-Scott was expelled from the party after Edward McMillan-Scottrebelling and running against a member of the Law and Justice (PiS) for the post of European parliament vice-president. McMillan-Scott decided to run because he was unhappy about the Conservatives alliance with Law and Justice. The Polish party have been accused of homophobia, racism and anti semitism.

Helmer accused McMillan-Scott of trying to "undermine" and "destabilise" the Conservative and Reformist Group (ECR).

Helmer's comments may damage the work the Conservatives have been doing to engage with the LGBT community, but the actions McMillan-Scott and the words of Sephton might reassure voters about the Conservatives LGBT credentials.

Post your comment

When commenting, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. Your email address, if supplied, will not be published or passed on to anyone outside of LGF Online but may be used to respond to you if required – see our Privacy Policy for more details.

  • Congratulations, great idea

    Posted by mpeay, 03/09/2009 12:30am (12 months ago)

  • Stephen Ellis - helmer is not the old guard he was only elected two months ago. Cameron could get rid of anyone he wanted!

    Carl Atkin - I love how Tories hate people making "party political points" when it is against them yet he doesn't tell his Tory friends to stop making this partisan attacks!!!

    Posted by Richard Angell, 12/08/2009 12:35pm (1 year ago)

  • Matthew Sephton claims saying that Tory MEP Helmer "most certainly does not represent the views of the modern Conservatives in any way, shape or form."

    Yet he was the MEP who set up the new Right Wing grouping in the European parliament (no small task) and the Tory (Edward McMillan-Scott) who stands up against homophobia and antisemitism is expelled from the Tory Party.

    Surely that is all you need to know about the Modern Conservative party that David Cameron is now running!

    Posted by Rochard Angell, 12/08/2009 12:31pm (1 year ago)

  • Same old Tories! The evidence is in the name - Conservatives - still holding the same traditional and archaic views that they always have done.

    Posted by Paul, 12/08/2009 8:02am (1 year ago)

  • I am saddened by the party political comment you have made Kevin. I am gay and proud to be a Tory. We have two members of the shadow who are in civil partnerships and all of the pronouncements by David Cameron's team on their committment to LGBT rights could not be more clear. I am disgusted by Roger Helmer's comments but we all need to work together across the political spectrum to stamp out homophobia and comments such as these in all the political parties.

    Posted by Carl Atkin, 11/08/2009 9:35pm (1 year ago)

  • Roger Helmer is part of the old guard. While he represents the very best opposition to a federal Europe, he's unfortunately way off the mark when it comes to LGBT issues - and he always has been. You only have to look at the line up of new Conservative candidates who will become MPs when Gordon Brown finally calls that election.

    If you want to see how the Conservative Party has changed, look at the new line up and not the old guard. Actions speak louder than words and no-one has done more than David Cameron to promote LGBT candidates. Every Party has its pro- and anti- LGBT members.

    Posted by Stephen Ellis, 11/08/2009 8:31pm (1 year ago)

  • Roger Helmer DOES NOT represent the views of the vast majority of the conservative party. I know lots of gay members of the party and also lots of gay people who are not interested in politics. People who are not really interested in politics are saying that they are going to vote conservative at the next election. For me, I am not just going to vote for a party purely on their gay issues, I have a job, a mortgage etc and want a arty who will deliver on all issues and bring this country out of the mess that Labour have created.

    I think the electorate has the intelligence to see for themselves what the conservative views on homosexuality are, if only Labour had the same faith in the electorate they'd have called an election by now.

    Labour have some very interesting allies in the European Parliament, something which they are not too keen to comment on!

    Posted by Dominic Wood, 11/08/2009 8:26pm (1 year ago)

  • Furthermor, I'm not sure how "the actions McMillan-Scott... might reassure voters about the Conservatives LGBT credentials" - he stood up, as a lone voice, against homophobic discrimination by the tories and they THREW HIM OUT!

    Posted by Kevin Peel, 11/08/2009 3:04pm (1 year ago)

  • I don't doubt Matthew's disgust, but the sad fact is that Roger Helmer DOES represent the vast majority of the conservative party, who CONSISTENTLY vote against ALL equality legislation brought in by the Government and display some very questionable views on LGBT rights.

    Cameron and his PR men can talk all they like about the 'new conservative party', but you don't have to look very far at all to see its true face.

    Posted by Kevin Peel, 11/08/2009 2:59pm (1 year ago)